On October 5, 2016, when the agreement reached enough signatures to cross the threshold, U.S. President Barack Obama said, “Even if we achieve all the goals… we will only get to part of where we need to go. He also said that “this agreement will help delay or avoid some of the worst consequences of climate change.” It will help other nations reduce their emissions over time and set bolder goals as technology progresses, all under a strong transparency system that will allow each nation to assess the progress of all other nations.   Updated on 06.01.17 to cover all 193 climate commitments. Syria and Nicaragua are the only countries that have not signed the Paris Agreement, with Nicaragua deeming the agreement too unambitious. But he says the efforts of most countries are insufficient. Climate Action Tracker estimates that, based on current country policy, temperatures are likely to rise by more than 5 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century. This could lead to catastrophic sea level rise and devastating extreme weather events. Are countries making progress? What kind? We met with the Climate Action Tracker to see who`s on the heels and who`s doing the best. The CTU covers all major issuers and a representative sample of small issuer issuers. Their data cover about 80 percent of global emissions and about 70% of the world`s population, and countries note, according to the probabilities of their Paris commitments and measures, whether other nations repeat them to achieve a global warming of 1.5 degrees C. While coal consumption has declined in the United States and Europe, new coal-fired power plants are planned in China, India and other countries; Industrialised countries such as Japan finance their construction abroad. There are several opportunities to integrate flexibility mechanisms into the broader transparency framework. The extent, degree of detail or frequency of reporting can all be adapted and modulated according to a country`s capacity.
The requirement to carry out technical checks in the country could be lifted for some less developed or small island developing states. Capacity assessment opportunities include financial and human resources in a country needed for NDC verification.  At the conclusion of COP 21 (the 21st meeting of the conference`s conference), december 12, 2015, the final text of the Paris Agreement was agreed upon by all 195 member states participating in the UNFCCC and the European Union to reduce emissions as part of the method of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In the 12-language agreement, members promised to reduce their carbon emissions “as soon as possible” and do their best to keep global warming “well below 2 degrees Celsius.”  The level of NCC set by each country will determine the country`s objectives. However, the “contributions” themselves are not binding under international law because of the lack of specificity, normative nature or language necessary to establish binding standards.  In addition, there will be no mechanism to compel a country to set a target in its NDC on a specified date and not for an application if a defined target is not achieved in an NDC.   There will be only a “Name and Shame” system  or as UN Deputy Secretary General for Climate Change, J. Pésztor, CBS News (US), a “Name and Encouragement” plan.
 Since the agreement has no consequences if countries do not live up to their commitments, such a consensus is fragile. A cattle of nations withdrawing from the agreement could trigger the withdrawal of other governments and lead to the total collapse of the agreement.  An unconditional 10% reduction in emissions from a business scenario by 2030, or a conditional reduction of 35% by 2030, depending on international assistance. Contains a section on adaptation that also requires international support.